Re: [PATCH] xfs_repair: update the manual content about xfs_repair exit status

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 9/9/16 11:47 PM, Zorro Lang wrote:
> The man 8 xfs_repair said "xfs_repair run without the -n option will
> always return a status code of 0". That's not correct.
> 
> xfs_repair will return 2 if it find valuable metadata changes in log
> which needs to be replayed, 1 if it can't fix the corruption or some
> other errors happened and 0 if nothing wrong or all the corruptions
> were fixed.
> 
> Generally xfs_repair -L will always return 0, except it can't clear
> the log.

And I think that's an operational type error, not the result
of a filesystem problem; more like an IO error, or a code bug,
I *think* ... more below.


> Signed-off-by: Zorro Lang <zlang@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I  trusted the xfs_repair manpage, and thought xfs_repair will always return 0.
> But recently I found it lies when I tried to review someone xfstests case.
> 
> A correct manpage will help more people to write right cases, so I try to modify
> the manpage, by search all exit/do_error in xfsprogs/repair. I'm not the best
> one who learn about xfs_repair, so I just hope I did the right thing:-P Please
> feel free to correct me.
> 
> Thanks,
> Zorro
> 
>  man/man8/xfs_repair.8 | 13 ++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/man/man8/xfs_repair.8 b/man/man8/xfs_repair.8
> index 1b4d9e3..1f8f13b 100644
> --- a/man/man8/xfs_repair.8
> +++ b/man/man8/xfs_repair.8
> @@ -504,12 +504,23 @@ that is known to be free. The entry is therefore invalid and is deleted.
>  This message refers to a large directory.
>  If the directory were small, the message would read "junking entry ...".
>  .SH EXIT STATUS
> +.TP
>  .B xfs_repair \-n
>  (no modify node)
>  will return a status of 1 if filesystem corruption was detected and
>  0 if no filesystem corruption was detected.
> +.TP
>  .B xfs_repair
> -run without the \-n option will always return a status code of 0.
> +run without the \-n option will return a status code of 2 if it find the
> +filesystem has valuable metadata changes in log which needs to be
> +replayed, 1 if there's corruption left to be fixed

I'm not sure that's the best description; from a quick look, I think
those exit values of 1 result from do_error(), and in repair that's
(usually?) due to something like a memory allocation failure, or an
inconsistent state in the tool; more like hitting an ASSERT.  That might
leave corruption, but only as a follow-on effect.

> + or can't find log head
> +and tail or some other errors happened, 

Which is the same as above, I think - an internal error.

> and 0 if nothing wrong or all the
> +corruptions were fixed.
> +.TP
> +.B xfs_repair \-L
> +(Force Log Zeroing)
> +will return a status code of 1 if it can't clear the log, or will always
> +return 0.


How about something like this:

 .B xfs_repair \-n
 (no modify node)
 will return a status of 1 if filesystem corruption was detected and
 0 if no filesystem corruption was detected.
 .TP
 .B xfs_repair
 run without the \-n option will return a status code of 2 if it finds a
 filesystem log which needs to be replayed (by a mount/umount cycle), 1 if
 a runtime error is encountered, and 0 in all other cases, whether or not
 filesystem corruption was detected.

and I'd leave out the bit about xfs_repair -L; really that's just a runtime
error - if we clear the log and then can't find the head/tail, something
strange has gone wrong.

Thanks,

-Eric

>  .SH BUGS
>  The filesystem to be checked and repaired must have been
>  unmounted cleanly using normal system administration procedures
> 

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs



[Index of Archives]     [Linux XFS Devel]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux