On 9/12/16 7:35 AM, Eric Sandeen wrote: > xfs_repair cannot proceed with a dirty log, and exits with > a status code of 2 in that case; fix the manpage to > reflect this. > > (This has been the case for years, but was never documented). > > Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx> Sorry, I missed Zorro's earlier patch, xfs_repair: update the manual content about xfs_repair exit status So drop this one, i'll go review Zorro's patch. -Eric > --- > > diff --git a/man/man8/xfs_repair.8 b/man/man8/xfs_repair.8 > index 1b4d9e3..57c970a 100644 > --- a/man/man8/xfs_repair.8 > +++ b/man/man8/xfs_repair.8 > @@ -509,7 +509,9 @@ If the directory were small, the message would read "junking entry ...". > will return a status of 1 if filesystem corruption was detected and > 0 if no filesystem corruption was detected. > .B xfs_repair > -run without the \-n option will always return a status code of 0. > +run without the \-n option will return a status code of 2 if the log is > +dirty and needs to be replayed, otherwise it will always return a status > +code of 0. > .SH BUGS > The filesystem to be checked and repaired must have been > unmounted cleanly using normal system administration procedures > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs