On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 11:32:46AM +0200, Jan Kara wrote: > So do you suggest xfs_iop_change_ok and xfs_iop_setattr_nonsize? I don't > really care, I just remember Dave had some ideas how names should be > consistent and this naming was his idea... Nah, just skip the prefix entirely, and maybe also already adopt to the new setattr_prepare naming. But if Dave already had an opinions let's just keep it as-is and sort the naming out later. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
