On Tue 09-08-16 01:27:56, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > +static int > > +xfs_vn_change_ok( > > + struct dentry *dentry, > > + struct iattr *iattr) > > Please don't use the _vn prefix for something that's not an > actual inode operation (and we should do a mess rename to > _iop one day as well.) > > > +int > > +xfs_vn_setattr_nonsize( > > + struct dentry *dentry, > > + struct iattr *iattr) > > Same here. So do you suggest xfs_iop_change_ok and xfs_iop_setattr_nonsize? I don't really care, I just remember Dave had some ideas how names should be consistent and this naming was his idea... Honza -- Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxxx> SUSE Labs, CR _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs