On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 05:37:10PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote: > On 3/4/16 5:23 AM, Eryu Guan wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I noticed some xfstests failures while testing v4 XFS with latest > > v4.5.0-rc1 xfsprogs on v4.5-rc6 kernel, and all these failures are gone > > if I use v3.2.4 xfsprogs, or if test on v5 XFS. > > > > So either xfstests needs update or xfsprogs breaks something for non-crc > > XFS. But I'm not sure which is which, so I post them out for broader > > review. > > > > (All tests are checked with 'MKFS_OPTIONS="-m crc=0" ./check <sometest>') > > Eryu, sorry you didn't get a reply on this in March. We should have > listened! ;) The patches I sent in the pat day or two should Thanks for looking at them! :) > fix some of these ... > > > == 1. xfs/032 fsck failure (xfs_db check) on ppc64 host == > > but not this one. Do you still see this? My recent test with 4.7-rc4 kernel and latest xfsprogs (June 22nd) shows xfs/032 passed on ppc64 host. But I'll retest to be sure. > > > == 2. xfs/033 fsck failure == > > > > xfs_repair detects more nlinks error. And this happens after commit > > "c2c5096 libxfs: update to 3.16 kernel code" > > this should be fixed by > [PATCH] xfs_repair: set rsumino version to 2 > > > == 3. xfs/108 xfs/196 xfs/261 xfs/244 fsck failure. == > > this should be fixed by > [PATCH] xfs_repair: don't call xfs_sb_quota_from_disk twice > > although I'm not sure about the ppc-specific failure. My recent test on RHEL7 shows xfs/244 is not ppc-specific. I'll retest with latest kernel and xfsprogs on ppc64 and report back. > > > These tests fail in a similiar way, and they are all quota related. > > Note that xfs/244 only fails on ppc64, others fail on all arches. > > > == 4. xfs/186 xfs/187 attr test failure == > > > > xfs/186 is missing almost all the attr values. > > [PATCH] xfs/186: fix test for crc=0, ftype=1 Thanks! I've queued it in fstests next pull request. Thanks, Eryu > > > xfs/187 reports test needs update. > > Not sure on this one yet. > > -Eric > > _______________________________________________ > xfs mailing list > xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx > http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
