> On Jun 24, 2016, at 11:44 PM, Eryu Guan <eguan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 05:37:10PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote: >>> On 3/4/16 5:23 AM, Eryu Guan wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I noticed some xfstests failures while testing v4 XFS with latest >>> v4.5.0-rc1 xfsprogs on v4.5-rc6 kernel, and all these failures are gone >>> if I use v3.2.4 xfsprogs, or if test on v5 XFS. >>> >>> So either xfstests needs update or xfsprogs breaks something for non-crc >>> XFS. But I'm not sure which is which, so I post them out for broader >>> review. >>> >>> (All tests are checked with 'MKFS_OPTIONS="-m crc=0" ./check <sometest>') >> >> Eryu, sorry you didn't get a reply on this in March. We should have >> listened! ;) The patches I sent in the pat day or two should > > Thanks for looking at them! :) > >> fix some of these ... >> >>> == 1. xfs/032 fsck failure (xfs_db check) on ppc64 host == >> >> but not this one. Do you still see this? > > My recent test with 4.7-rc4 kernel and latest xfsprogs (June 22nd) shows > xfs/032 passed on ppc64 host. But I'll retest to be sure. I wasn't thinking. Brian's recent sparse inode patches fix this one. Eric _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
