On Sun, Mar 06, 2016 at 11:46:58AM +0200, Alex Lyakas wrote: > Hello Dave, > > On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 11:31 PM, Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 11:18:43AM +0200, Alex Lyakas wrote: > >> Hello Dave, > >> Thanks for the patch! I confirm that it fixes the scenario. > >> > >> At [1] please find all the blknos that are being used during the log > >> recovery (if that's of any interest). > > .... > >> Mar 3 11:17:41 vc-00-00-350-dev kernel: [ 68.129739] > >> _xfs_buf_find: blkno=200705 eofs=204800 >m_sb.sb_dblocks=25600 > >> Mar 3 11:17:41 vc-00-00-350-dev kernel: [ 68.129746] > >> _xfs_buf_find: blkno=200705 eofs=204800 >m_sb.sb_dblocks=25600 > > > > Where is the warning that this block is out of range? > Perhaps you are being confused by the ">" mark that appears in the > prints? This was definitely added by mistake, it appears on every > print. I apologize for that. > If not, then my understanding is that 200705 is still less than > 204800, so this block number is not out of range. And since we have > added the new pag structure, the issue is now fixed. Sorry, I misread it as 200480, not 204800. My fault, too much to do, brain mostly fried by other stuff. So the patch works. Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
