Re: xfs resize: primary superblock is not updated immediately

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 11:18:43AM +0200, Alex Lyakas wrote:
> Hello Dave,
> Thanks for the patch! I confirm that it fixes the scenario.
> 
> At [1] please find all the blknos that are being used during the log
> recovery (if that's of any interest).
....
> Mar  3 11:17:41 vc-00-00-350-dev kernel: [   68.129739]
> _xfs_buf_find: blkno=200705 eofs=204800 >m_sb.sb_dblocks=25600
> Mar  3 11:17:41 vc-00-00-350-dev kernel: [   68.129746]
> _xfs_buf_find: blkno=200705 eofs=204800 >m_sb.sb_dblocks=25600

Where is the warning that this block is out of range?

And why didn't recovery fail at this point because the block
requested is out of range and so the buffer lookup should have
failed?

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs



[Index of Archives]     [Linux XFS Devel]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux