Hello Dave, On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 11:31 PM, Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 11:18:43AM +0200, Alex Lyakas wrote: >> Hello Dave, >> Thanks for the patch! I confirm that it fixes the scenario. >> >> At [1] please find all the blknos that are being used during the log >> recovery (if that's of any interest). > .... >> Mar 3 11:17:41 vc-00-00-350-dev kernel: [ 68.129739] >> _xfs_buf_find: blkno=200705 eofs=204800 >m_sb.sb_dblocks=25600 >> Mar 3 11:17:41 vc-00-00-350-dev kernel: [ 68.129746] >> _xfs_buf_find: blkno=200705 eofs=204800 >m_sb.sb_dblocks=25600 > > Where is the warning that this block is out of range? Perhaps you are being confused by the ">" mark that appears in the prints? This was definitely added by mistake, it appears on every print. I apologize for that. If not, then my understanding is that 200705 is still less than 204800, so this block number is not out of range. And since we have added the new pag structure, the issue is now fixed. Otherwise, I can provide an XFS metadump for you to analyze. Thanks, Alex. > > And why didn't recovery fail at this point because the block > requested is out of range and so the buffer lookup should have > failed? > > Cheers, > > Dave. > -- > Dave Chinner > david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
