On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 11:02:55PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 01:58:53PM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > > Aw, snap, I knew I'd forgotten something. Yep, we'll need that... I think > > xfs_end_io_direct_write will have to sniff out the error status from "size" > > and either remap or discard the CoW allocations as appropriate. > > I'd rather fix the direct I/O code to give us that information directly > (pun intended). I'll add that to my short term todo list as it seems > useful for the existing code as well. Ok. As for the generic/154... the code on github is sadly not very bisectable, other than to say that until yesterday I was still tacking new code onto the end of the patchset. That said, I was seeing occasional hangs in generic/154 (I needed to roll the transactions between key parts of wrapping up a CoW) and they seem to have gone away, so it's possible that I've fixed it already. --D _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
