On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 01:58:53PM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > Aw, snap, I knew I'd forgotten something. Yep, we'll need that... I think > xfs_end_io_direct_write will have to sniff out the error status from "size" > and either remap or discard the CoW allocations as appropriate. I'd rather fix the direct I/O code to give us that information directly (pun intended). I'll add that to my short term todo list as it seems useful for the existing code as well. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
