On Sat, Sep 19, 2015 at 08:56:24AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote: > On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 11:01:45AM -0500, Troy McCorkell wrote: > > xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx is an open list and does not require people to be members > > of the list to post to it. The spam filters applied to > > xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx are > > as aggressive as they can be and still allow for an open list. > > > > Next option would be to add a moderator to the list. Adding a moderator > > would interfere with non-list members posting to the list. > > Moderation is not an option because of this interference and the > burden it puts on the moderator to respond in a timely fashion. > > If the spam rejection does not improve our next option is to move to > the linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx list - the vger infrastructure is not > perfect, but it does have better spam rejection than the current > filtering on this list. This may be the best long-term solution to > the problem, but it does involve short term pain for everyone. > +1 for that, the pain is not that much, and we've discussed moving xfs list to vger.kernel.org for a while, I really don't see a reason to do so, other than people needing to update their e-mail addresses and maybe git configurations. To relief even more the pain, xfs@sgi, could just forward the e-mails to linux-xfs with a InReplyTo modified to linux-xfs even. Althouh, I'm not sure how feasible is the last part. > Cheers, > > Dave. > -- > Dave Chinner > david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > _______________________________________________ > xfs mailing list > xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx > http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs -- Carlos _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
