On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 11:01:45AM -0500, Troy McCorkell wrote: > xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx is an open list and does not require people to be members > of the list to post to it. The spam filters applied to > xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx are > as aggressive as they can be and still allow for an open list. > > Next option would be to add a moderator to the list. Adding a moderator > would interfere with non-list members posting to the list. Moderation is not an option because of this interference and the burden it puts on the moderator to respond in a timely fashion. If the spam rejection does not improve our next option is to move to the linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx list - the vger infrastructure is not perfect, but it does have better spam rejection than the current filtering on this list. This may be the best long-term solution to the problem, but it does involve short term pain for everyone. Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
