On Mon 24-08-15 16:24:25, Dave Chinner wrote: > On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 11:18:16AM +0800, Eryu Guan wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 11:11:23AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote: > > > > > > Eryu, can you change the way you run the event trace to be: > > > > > > $ sudo trace-cmd <options> -o <outfile location> ./check <test options> > > > > > > rather than running the trace as a background operation elsewhere? > > > Maybe that will give better results. > > > > The results are here > > > > http://128.199.137.77/writeback-v3/ <snip> > What I can't see in the traces is where sync is doing a blocking > sync pass on the fileystem. The wbc control structure being passed > to XFS is: > > wbc_writepage: bdi 253:0: towrt=45569 skip=0 mode=0 kupd=0 bgrd=0 reclm=0 cyclic=0 start=0x0 end=0x7fffffffffffffff > > Which is not coming from sync_inodes_sb() as the sync mode is > incorrect (i.e. not WB_SYNC_ALL). It looks to me that writeback is > coming from a generic bdi flusher command rather than a directed > superblock sync. i.e. through wakeup_flusher_threads() which sets: > > work->sync_mode = WB_SYNC_NONE; > work->nr_pages = nr_pages; > work->range_cyclic = range_cyclic; > work->reason = reason; > work->auto_free = 1; > > as the reason is "sync": > > sync-18849 writeback_queue: bdi 253:0: sb_dev 0:0 nr_pages=308986 sync_mode=0 kupdate=0 range_cyclic=0 background=0 reason=sync > sync-18849 writeback_queue: bdi 253:0: sb_dev 253:1 nr_pages=9223372036854775807 sync_mode=1 kupdate=0 range_cyclic=0 background=0 reason=sync > .... > kworker/u8:1-1563 writeback_exec: bdi 253:0: sb_dev 0:0 nr_pages=308986 sync_mode=0 kupdate=0 range_cyclic=0 background=0 reason=sync > kworker/u8:1-1563 writeback_start: bdi 253:0: sb_dev 0:0 nr_pages=308986 sync_mode=0 kupdate=0 range_cyclic=0 background=0 reason=sync > > The next writeback_queue/writeback_exec tracepoint pair are: > > .... > kworker/2:1-17163 xfs_setfilesize: dev 253:6 ino 0xef6506 isize 0xa00000 disize 0x0 offset 0x0 count 10481664 > kworker/2:1-17163 xfs_setfilesize: dev 253:6 ino 0xef6506 isize 0xa00000 disize 0x9ff000 offset 0x9ff000 count 4096 > sync-18849 wbc_writepage: bdi 253:0: towrt=9223372036854775798 skip=0 mode=1 kupd=0 bgrd=0 reclm=0 cyclic=0 start=0x0 end=0x7fffffffffffffff > sync-18849 wbc_writepage: bdi 253:0: towrt=9223372036854775797 skip=0 mode=1 kupd=0 bgrd=0 reclm=0 cyclic=0 start=0x0 end=0x7fffffffffffffff > sync-18849 wbc_writepage: bdi 253:0: towrt=9223372036854775796 skip=0 mode=1 kupd=0 bgrd=0 reclm=0 cyclic=0 start=0x0 end=0x7fffffffffffffff > sync-18849 wbc_writepage: bdi 253:0: towrt=9223372036854775795 skip=0 mode=1 kupd=0 bgrd=0 reclm=0 cyclic=0 start=0x0 end=0x7fffffffffffffff > umount-18852 writeback_queue: bdi 253:0: sb_dev 253:6 nr_pages=22059 sync_mode=0 kupdate=0 range_cyclic=0 background=0 reason=sync > kworker/u8:1-1563 writeback_exec: bdi 253:0: sb_dev 253:6 nr_pages=22059 sync_mode=0 kupdate=0 range_cyclic=0 background=0 reason=sync > .... > > which shows unmount being the next writeback event queued and > executed after the IO completions have come in (that missed the > log). What is missing is the specific queue/exec events for > sync_sb_inodes() from the sync code for each filesystem. Bah, I see the problem and indeed it was introduced by commit e79729123f639 "writeback: don't issue wb_writeback_work if clean". The problem is that we bail out of sync_inodes_sb() if there is no dirty IO. Which is wrong because we have to wait for any outstanding IO (i.e. call wait_sb_inodes()) regardless of dirty state! And that also explains why Tejun's patch fixes the problem because it backs out the change to the exit condition in sync_inodes_sb(). So Tejun's patch from this thread is indeed fixing the real problem but the comment in sync_inodes_sb() should be fixed to mention wait_sb_inodes() must be called in all cases... Tejun, will you fixup the comment please? Honza -- Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxxx> SUSE Labs, CR _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
