On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 11:16:03AM +0200, Jan Kara wrote: > On Mon 17-08-15 16:02:54, Tejun Heo wrote: > > Hello, Jan. > > > > On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 01:14:09PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote: > > > So the patch looks good to me. But the fact that is fixes Eryu's problem > > > means there is something fishy going on. Either inodes get wrongly attached > > > > Seriously, it shouldn't affect size syncing or xfs but then again my > > understanding of xfs is severely limited. > > Well, i_size == 0 in XFS usually means that writeback didn't get to > flushing delay allocated pages - inode size on disk gets increased only > after the pages are written out in ->end_io callback. So at least this part > makes some sense to me. Hmm... the only possibility I can think of is tot_write_bandwidth being zero when it shouldn't be. I've been staring at the code for a while now but nothing rings a bell. Time for another debug patch, I guess. Thanks. -- tejun _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
