On Mon 17-08-15 16:02:54, Tejun Heo wrote: > Hello, Jan. > > On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 01:14:09PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote: > > So the patch looks good to me. But the fact that is fixes Eryu's problem > > means there is something fishy going on. Either inodes get wrongly attached > > Seriously, it shouldn't affect size syncing or xfs but then again my > understanding of xfs is severely limited. Well, i_size == 0 in XFS usually means that writeback didn't get to flushing delay allocated pages - inode size on disk gets increased only after the pages are written out in ->end_io callback. So at least this part makes some sense to me. Honza -- Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxxx> SUSE Labs, CR _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
