Hello, Jan. On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 01:14:09PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote: > So the patch looks good to me. But the fact that is fixes Eryu's problem > means there is something fishy going on. Either inodes get wrongly attached Seriously, it shouldn't affect size syncing or xfs but then again my understanding of xfs is severely limited. > to b_dirty_time list or bdi_has_dirty_io() somehow misbehaves only > temporarily and we don't catch it with the debug patch. > > Can we add a test to wb_has_dirty_io() to also check whether it matches > bdi_has_dirty_io()? Since Eryu doesn't use lazytime (I assume, Eryu, please > speak up if you do), we could also warn if b_dirty_time lists get > non-empty. Hmm? Sure, will prep a patch soon. Thanks. -- tejun _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
