Hey Christoph, On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 08:46:03AM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > Trying to support tiny disks only and saving a bit memory might have > made sense on an SGI O2 15 years ago, but is pretty pointless today. > > Remove the rarely tested codepath that uses various smaller in-memory > types to reduce our test matrix and make the codebase a little bit > smaller and less complicated. > > > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> This looks ok to me. I'm not seeing much downside to removing the smaller in-memory types. Reviewed-by: Ben Myers <bpm@xxxxxxx> Thanks, Ben _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
