On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 04:15:59PM -0600, Ben Myers wrote: > Hey Christoph, > > On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 08:46:03AM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > Trying to support tiny disks only and saving a bit memory might have > > made sense on an SGI O2 15 years ago, but is pretty pointless today. > > > > Remove the rarely tested codepath that uses various smaller in-memory > > types to reduce our test matrix and make the codebase a little bit > > smaller and less complicated. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> > > This looks ok to me. I'm not seeing much downside to removing the smaller > in-memory types. > > Reviewed-by: Ben Myers <bpm@xxxxxxx> Anyone else have an opinion on this one? I think its 3.14 material and I'd like to pull it in. Thanks, Ben _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
