Hey, On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 03:37:01PM -0600, Ben Myers wrote: > On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 08:46:03AM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > Trying to support tiny disks only and saving a bit memory might have > > made sense on an SGI O2 15 years ago, but is pretty pointless today. > > > > Remove the rarely tested codepath that uses various smaller in-memory > > types to reduce our test matrix and make the codebase a little bit > > smaller and less complicated. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> > > > > diff --git a/fs/xfs/Kconfig b/fs/xfs/Kconfig > > index 399e8ce..5d47b4d 100644 > > --- a/fs/xfs/Kconfig > > +++ b/fs/xfs/Kconfig > > @@ -1,6 +1,7 @@ > > config XFS_FS > > tristate "XFS filesystem support" > > depends on BLOCK > > + depends on (64BIT || LBDAF) > > There are quite a few 32 bit arches in use today. We need to continue to > support them in XFS as long as they are supported by the kernel. Unless I have > misunderstood what you are suggesting, I believe the answer to this patch must > be a firm 'no'. I stepped away for a few minutes and realized my mistake. ;/ Apologies! I'll take another look at the rest of the patch. Thanks, Ben _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
