On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 01:10:55PM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Fri, Dec 06, 2013 at 08:05:57AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: > > > Haven't really done an in-depth audit, mostly just looking at > > > where the asserts kick in.. > > > > Right - I just did a scan with cscope on the users of > > XFS_ILOCK_SHARED, and those two were the only ones that stuck out > > that weren't handled correctly.... > > With MAXPATHLEN at 1024 a symlink is at max 2 extents and thus never in > btree format, so I don't think we'll need it in readlink. The attr > cases look real, though. True, because the data fork will always have space for 3 extents (#define MINDBTPTRS 3) and so it won't go out of line regardless of the attribute fork. Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
