On Fri, Dec 06, 2013 at 08:05:57AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: > > Haven't really done an in-depth audit, mostly just looking at > > where the asserts kick in.. > > Right - I just did a scan with cscope on the users of > XFS_ILOCK_SHARED, and those two were the only ones that stuck out > that weren't handled correctly.... With MAXPATHLEN at 1024 a symlink is at max 2 extents and thus never in btree format, so I don't think we'll need it in readlink. The attr cases look real, though. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
