On Fri, Dec 06, 2013 at 07:59:10AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: > I think the locking here should be moved inside xfs_attr_get_int() Or we could just kill xfs_attr_get_int.. > so that it uses the same locking pattern as xfs_attr_set() and > xfs_attr_remove(). > > Also, xfs_attr_list() needs this treatment (the attr version of > readdir) as well (and it has the locking inside xfs_attr_list_int(), > too ;). > > It looks like xfs_readlink needs fixing, too. Haven't really done an in-depth audit, mostly just looking at where the asserts kick in.. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
