Hi Ben, On Tue, 20 Aug 2013 14:28:44 -0500 Ben Myers <bpm@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > I'd prefer not to break Stephen's tree two days in a row. We could just revert > d6970d4b726c in the xfs tree for the time being as Stephen has done, but given > the choice would prefer the fix. Do you have a preference between the two > approaches that Dwight has posted? The first seems more conservative... I will automatically revert that commit when I merge the xfs tree until some other solution is forthcoming (so you don't have to do the revert in the xfs tree). This does need to be fixed fairly soon, though. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Attachment:
pgptBkaBtFbIl.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
