Hey Stephen, On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 10:22:46AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > On Tue, 20 Aug 2013 14:28:44 -0500 Ben Myers <bpm@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > I'd prefer not to break Stephen's tree two days in a row. We could just revert > > d6970d4b726c in the xfs tree for the time being as Stephen has done, but given > > the choice would prefer the fix. Do you have a preference between the two > > approaches that Dwight has posted? The first seems more conservative... > > I will automatically revert that commit when I merge the xfs tree until > some other solution is forthcoming (so you don't have to do the revert in > the xfs tree). Gah. That makes sense. ;) > This does need to be fixed fairly soon, though. Agreed, thanks. -Ben _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
