On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 10:30 PM, Mark Tinguely <tinguely@xxxxxxx> wrote: > On 08/07/13 09:01, Zhi Yong Wu wrote: >> >> On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 9:29 PM, Mark Tinguely<tinguely@xxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>> On 08/07/13 05:11, zwu.kernel@xxxxxxxxx wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> From: Zhi Yong Wu<wuzhy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Zhi Yong Wu<wuzhy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>> --- >>>> fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c | 2 +- >>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >>>> >>>> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c >>>> index bb262c2..ccca9cd 100644 >>>> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c >>>> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c >>>> @@ -2103,7 +2103,7 @@ xfs_ifree( >>>> * >>>> * The caller must not request to add more records than would fit in >>>> * the on-disk inode root. If the if_broot is currently NULL, then >>>> - * if we adding records one will be allocated. The caller must also >>>> + * if we are adding records, one will be allocated. The caller must >>>> also >>>> * not request that the number of records go below zero, although >>>> * it can go to zero. >>>> * >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Change this to xfs_inode_fork.c and the series will apply on top of >>> Dave's >>> "current patch queue for Linux 3.12": >> >> Do you mean that you have done this or i need to do this? If i need to do >> this, >> can you let me know where i can get xfs git repo which has applied >> Dave's patchset? >> >>> >>> http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2013-07/msg00411.html > > > > If approved, we can make the change on commit. Please feel free to do it, thanks a lot. > > The patches look okay to me. > > --Mark. > -- Regards, Zhi Yong Wu _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
