On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 9:29 PM, Mark Tinguely <tinguely@xxxxxxx> wrote: > On 08/07/13 05:11, zwu.kernel@xxxxxxxxx wrote: >> >> From: Zhi Yong Wu<wuzhy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> >> Signed-off-by: Zhi Yong Wu<wuzhy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c | 2 +- >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c >> index bb262c2..ccca9cd 100644 >> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c >> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c >> @@ -2103,7 +2103,7 @@ xfs_ifree( >> * >> * The caller must not request to add more records than would fit in >> * the on-disk inode root. If the if_broot is currently NULL, then >> - * if we adding records one will be allocated. The caller must also >> + * if we are adding records, one will be allocated. The caller must also >> * not request that the number of records go below zero, although >> * it can go to zero. >> * > > > > Change this to xfs_inode_fork.c and the series will apply on top of Dave's > "current patch queue for Linux 3.12": Do you mean that you have done this or i need to do this? If i need to do this, can you let me know where i can get xfs git repo which has applied Dave's patchset? > > http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2013-07/msg00411.html -- Regards, Zhi Yong Wu _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
