On 08/07/13 09:01, Zhi Yong Wu wrote:
On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 9:29 PM, Mark Tinguely<tinguely@xxxxxxx> wrote:
On 08/07/13 05:11, zwu.kernel@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
From: Zhi Yong Wu<wuzhy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Zhi Yong Wu<wuzhy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c
index bb262c2..ccca9cd 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c
@@ -2103,7 +2103,7 @@ xfs_ifree(
*
* The caller must not request to add more records than would fit in
* the on-disk inode root. If the if_broot is currently NULL, then
- * if we adding records one will be allocated. The caller must also
+ * if we are adding records, one will be allocated. The caller must also
* not request that the number of records go below zero, although
* it can go to zero.
*
Change this to xfs_inode_fork.c and the series will apply on top of Dave's
"current patch queue for Linux 3.12":
Do you mean that you have done this or i need to do this? If i need to do this,
can you let me know where i can get xfs git repo which has applied
Dave's patchset?
http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2013-07/msg00411.html
If approved, we can make the change on commit.
The patches look okay to me.
--Mark.
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
