On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 11:09:22PM +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote: > Am Mon, 4 Mar 2013 13:05:23 -0800 > schrieb Joel Becker <jlbec@xxxxxxxxxxxx>: > > > Really, xfstests is not designed for testing cluster filesystems in > > > clustered environments. If we really want to support clustered > > > filesystems and cluster wide operations, then we need to think > > > about how to architect multi-host support into xfstests sanely. > > > Clustered filesystems are not the only people that could make use of > > > such functionality (NFS and CIFS come to mind).... ;) > > > > I'm much happier with the "check for other cluster mounts" approach > > rather than avoiding fsck entirely. We like xfstests in the local or > > single-node cases to behave exactly as one would expect. > > > > We do run xfstests on multiple nodes in a cluster, but by hand and > > with our own cleanup. Obviously support for automating that would be > > awesome :-) > > Can you share your cleanup code? It's not code, unless you count DNA and neuron connections... Joel > > Thanks, > //richard > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- Life's Little Instruction Book #139 "Never deprive someone of hope; it might be all they have." http://www.jlbec.org/ jlbec@xxxxxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
