On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 11:42:29AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: > On Sun, Mar 03, 2013 at 04:57:55PM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote: > > On 3/3/13 4:53 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote: > > > > >> Anyway, what if you did something more along the lines of [pseudocode] > > >> > > >> ocfs2) > > >> if mounted.ocfs2 -f $TEST-DEV | frob_as_necessary[1] > > >> ; > > >> else > > >> fsck.ocfs2 $TEST-DEV > > >> fi > > >> ;; > > >> > > >> so that *if* it's mounted on some other node, the fsck won't run. > > >> That has downsides as Dave mentioned, but for the case where the > > >> xfstests node is the only one with it in use, it'll still do the > > >> beneficial consistency check. > > >> > > >> Just tweaking the fsck action bsed on *if* it's mounted (or, > > >> maybe, if the node is in a cluster?) might be a more generic solution > > >> that is widely applicable to all ocfs2 test environments. > > > > > > Good point. mounted.ocfs2 really makes sense. I'll implement this on my > > > test suite and submit a new patch. > > > > Sounds good to me. > > > > It'd be most preferable to do a cluster-wide unmount and fsck, > > Which makes no sense to me, because ./check will then do a cluster > wide unmount as it runs the test harness initialisation. Hence all > the subsequent tests will run with the filesystem only mounted on > the local node.... > > Really, xfstests is not designed for testing cluster filesystems in > clustered environments. If we really want to support clustered > filesystems and cluster wide operations, then we need to think > about how to architect multi-host support into xfstests sanely. > Clustered filesystems are not the only people that could make use of > such functionality (NFS and CIFS come to mind).... ;) I'm much happier with the "check for other cluster mounts" approach rather than avoiding fsck entirely. We like xfstests in the local or single-node cases to behave exactly as one would expect. We do run xfstests on multiple nodes in a cluster, but by hand and with our own cleanup. Obviously support for automating that would be awesome :-) Joel > > Cheers, > > Dave/ > -- > Dave Chinner > david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- "Born under a bad sign. I been down since I began to crawl. If it wasn't for bad luck, I wouldn't have no luck at all." http://www.jlbec.org/ jlbec@xxxxxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
