Re: bad version from xfs_repair after raid crash

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 8/11/12 9:59 AM, Andreas Vogler wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> we had a crash of a raid 5 system. After rebuilding we could access one of  two partitions. Upon mounting the second parttion we got an error "mount: Structure needs cleaning". So we tried using xfs_repair.
> 
> Xfs_repair returns: "bad primary superblock - bad version number !!!"
> 
> and tries to find a secondary superblock but gives up after scanning the volume.
> 
> Looking at the superblock with xfs_db looks good as far as I can tell. Can anybody give me a hint what "bad version number" means?

There is a version number in the superblock itself, which must have features recognized by repair.

Is your xfsprogs version up to date?

You could also include another email with the output from xfs_db -c "sb 0" -c "p" /dev/blah

-Eric

> Thank you very much in advance.
> 
>   Andreas Vogler
> 
> _______________________________________________
> xfs mailing list
> xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
> http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
> 

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs


[Index of Archives]     [Linux XFS Devel]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux