On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 11:23:10AM -0600, Ben Myers wrote: > On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 12:17:27PM -0500, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > > I should have replied to this patch, not the older rev. > > > > > > I have a question about the error code, now we're not mapping errors to > > > EFAULT and we used do... which is correct? > > > > The old one looks finshy, but we even if we changed it it should be > > in a separate patch with a good description. I'll resend with this bit > > fixed. > > Sounds great. ;) Actually the patch is fine as-is. If you look at the old xfs_qm_scall_getquota we'd return any error we get from xfs_qm_dqget as-is, and return ENOENT if XFS_IS_DQUOT_UNINITIALIZED is true. The place where any other error is converted to EFAULT is never actually reached. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
