> I should have replied to this patch, not the older rev. > > I have a question about the error code, now we're not mapping errors to > EFAULT and we used do... which is correct? The old one looks finshy, but we even if we changed it it should be in a separate patch with a good description. I'll resend with this bit fixed. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
