On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 12:17:27PM -0500, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > I should have replied to this patch, not the older rev. > > > > I have a question about the error code, now we're not mapping errors to > > EFAULT and we used do... which is correct? > > The old one looks finshy, but we even if we changed it it should be > in a separate patch with a good description. I'll resend with this bit > fixed. Sounds great. ;) -Ben _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
