On Wed, 23 Feb 2011, Erik Gulliksson wrote:
Hi Emmanuel,
Thanks for your prompt reply.
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 3:46 PM, Emmanuel Florac <eflorac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
What firmware version are you using?
( tw_cli /cX show firmware )
# tw_cli /c0 show firmware
/c0 Firmware Version = FE9X 4.10.00.007
The latest is:
9.5.1-9650-Upgrade.zip
9.5.2-9650-Upgrade.zip
9.5.3-9650-Upgrade.zip
9650SE_9690SA_firmware_beta_fw4.10.00.016.zip
9650SE_9690SA_firmware_beta_fw_4.10.00.019.zip <- latest
Augh. That sounds pretty bad. What does " tw_cli /cX/uY show all" look
like?
Yes, it is bad - a decision has been made to replace these disks with
"enterprise"-versions (without TLER/ERC problems etc). Tw_cli produces
this output for the volume:
This would seem to be the problem, you should go with Hiatchi next time.
You can use regular non-enterprise drives (Hiatchi) and they just work.
Seagate is a question
Samsung is a question
WD needs TLER.
# tw_cli /c0/u0 show all
/c0/u0 status = OK
/c0/u0 is not rebuilding, its current state is OK
/c0/u0 is not verifying, its current state is OK
/c0/u0 is initialized.
/c0/u0 Write Cache = on
/c0/u0 Read Cache = Intelligent
/c0/u0 volume(s) = 1
/c0/u0 name = xxx
/c0/u0 serial number = yyy
/c0/u0 Ignore ECC policy = off
/c0/u0 Auto Verify Policy = off
/c0/u0 Storsave Policy = protection
/c0/u0 Command Queuing Policy = on
/c0/u0 Rapid RAID Recovery setting = all
/c0/u0 Parity Number = 2
Unit UnitType Status %RCmpl %V/I/M Port Stripe Size(GB)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
u0 RAID-6 OK - - - 256K 12572.8
u0-0 DISK OK - - p12 - 1396.97
u0-1 DISK OK - - p21 - 1396.97
u0-2 DISK OK - - p14 - 1396.97
u0-3 DISK OK - - p15 - 1396.97
u0-4 DISK OK - - p16 - 1396.97
u0-5 DISK OK - - p17 - 1396.97
u0-6 DISK OK - - p18 - 1396.97
u0-7 DISK OK - - p19 - 1396.97
u0-8 DISK OK - - p20 - 1396.97
u0-9 DISK OK - - p0 - 1396.97
u0-10 DISK OK - - p22 - 1396.97
u0/v0 Volume - - - - - 12572.8
As far as the problem at hand, I do not know of a good way to fix it unless
you had ls -lRi /raid_array output so you could map the inodes to their
original locations. Sorry don't have a better answer..
Justin.
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
