Re: 2d performance info

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ed Sweetman (ed.sweetman@xxxxxxxxx):

> My config settings for my matrox g450 are aggressive with agp enabled

  Does the open source driver use DMA at all?  If it doesn't, do the
higher AGP modes even help at all?

> and backing store enabled,

  Is this good or bad?

> i'm being held back by this G450 despite all the support for using the
> backend scaler and triple buffering for video playback that i use
> often.

  Don't trust this.  The video stuff is often quite hacky and it's not
very good, even for this 'well supported' card.  Specs are widely
available yet all of these drivers could still use a ton of work, and
now the cards are getting quite obsolete.

> And are there any other 2d Xfree86 benchmarks out there that benchmark
> the functions and extensions actually used in X these days like render
> and shape and pixmap manipulation and all that stuff?

  I am not sure of one in particular but the ones we like to use for
supporting our app are mostly just 'x11perf -shmput500' which is usually
a good indication of what any sort of 2D app would need (at least it's a
good estimate for video or 2D game performance).

  -Billy

_______________________________________________
XFree86 mailing list
XFree86@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86

[Index of Archives]     [X Forum]     [Xorg]     [XFree86 Newbie]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [Font Config]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Kernel]

  Powered by Linux