Re: Bugbot for all kernel bugs?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 14.07.23 22:19, Konstantin Ryabitsev wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 13, 2023 at 01:45:58PM +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
>>> So, we can't easily do "enable for all the bugs" because the bot was written
>>> with the idea that it would be invoked per-component. Is there a bugzilla
>>> component (and a matching mailing list) that you have in mind for the bot?
>>
>> Ugh. :-/ Well, as you can see from a quick search like
>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/?q=%28nq%3A%22noticed+a+regression+report+in+bugzilla.kernel.org%22+f%3Aleemhuis%29+OR+%28nq%3A%22I+notice+a+regression+report+on+Bugzilla%22+f%3Asanjaya%29
>> we have to deal will bug reports for many different components. So it
>> would be great if it could be enabled for all products/components, except:
>>
>> * all components from the product categories "Alternate Trees",
>> "Backports project", "Documentation", "kernel.org", and "Tools"
>>
>> * "Bug Tracker", "klibc/kinit", "module-init-tools", and "Spam" from the
>> product category "Other"
>>
>> There might be a few more that are obsolete hidden in the other products
>> categories (like "PS3" in "Platform Specific/Hardware" or "lguest" in
>> "Virtualization")
>>
>> Did I say "Ugh" already? Ohh, seems I did. :-/
>>
>> So how do you suggest to move forward
> 
> One of the main drives behind bugbot was to eliminate as many components as
> possible and just let people file bugs under "Linux/Kernel". The "bug
> wrangler" people would then do initial triage

So bugs that people file for products/components that will remain won't
get triage? Wondering if that is a wise idea, but whatever, that is
nothing I'd consider a blocker, so let see.

> and set the "Subsystem" field to
> match an entry from MAINTAINERS. Then, they would set the "bugbot" flag to "+"
> and let the bot do the rest, fully bridging bugzilla with the mailing lists.
> 
> So, in my perfect little world we'd:
> 
> 1. identify products/components that we can abandon right away and close them
>    for new bug entry
> 2. identify the "bug wranglers" who can do the initial triage and grant them
>    the power to set the "bugbot" flag
> 3. catch and fix the bugs
> 
> We can start with #1 if everyone is happy with this course of action.

Hmmm, that's fine with me, but all that will take some time, hence allow
me to ask: if there a downside (much work?) to simply enable it now for
lots of other products/components until 1 and 2 are realized?

Ciao, Thorsten



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux