I suppose if something were added saying something like "for the
prevention of spam" or something like that then it would be much clearer.
Christoph M. Becker <mailto:cmbecker69@xxxxxx>
Tuesday, September 20, 2016 4:01 PM
On 20.09.2016 at 23:17, Sam Hobbs wrote:
Oh, I see; the question is an intelligence test and I failed. I got it now.
It's not supposed to be an intelligence test, but rather a spam
The wording certainly can be improved – suggestions are welcome!
Please consider not to top-post, see
I will try. I try to be consistent with the message I am replying to.
Note that usually when someone says do not "top-post" they really mean
that replying inline, as you did, is preferred.
This email client I use is a bit finicky. I am not sure this will work
properly, I hope it is still readable at the other end.