RE: Re: GD2 function issue

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I don't feel for argue about this.

You asked the readers of this list for a comments on weather you were
correct or not on weather your bug report was a true bug or not. It is quit
obviouse that it is not a bug report. Its more like a "request for change".
Period.


On your problems with the lack of documentation for compiling DLL's:

If you have such a poor compiler documentation which does not tell you how
to use feature X when you need to, then I would suggest you to change to a
compiler wich actually tells you how to do that - for instance Borland C/C++
or MS C++ devstudio.

Another way would be to specify which compiler you use and just ask here on
how to do it.

-----Original Message-----
From: choinet
To: php-windows@lists.php.net
Sent: 2004-01-03 23:05
Subject: RE:  Re: GD2 function issue


--- "Svensson, B.A.T. (HKG)" <B.A.T.Svensson@lumc.nl>
wrote:
> Choinet wrote: "When you reply to all, please only
> use
> the mailing list address, as I received four emails
> from
> your two replies."
> 
> That's the way it works for all of use. Or do you
> want
> to claim this to be a bug to? ;) :)
> 

Actually, all you have to do is reply to all and then
remove the other addresses until only the
php-windows@lists.php.net address is remaining. That
way, everyone gets one email of it. Looks like you did
it right this time, so I'm not complaining :)

> Anyhow, on to your explanation. What you now say is
> that you would like to change the spcification of
> the beahviour of the code, and that is NOT the same
> thing as having found a bug!
> 

We are already past that issue. Note that I refer to
it as a problem now.

> Hypoteticaly: if they changes the soure code
> according to
> your specification, it might work for you, but then
> php
> code will fail for others developper who is
> dependent on
> the present specification. Nice for you, but not so
> nice
> for other developers.
> 

Well, a change like this would help more than it
hurts, considering there is an extremely large PHP
user base. Anyway, I also stated to let there be
alternatively be additional logic that checks to see
if the untokenized font path works, if a different
listseparator character cannot satisfy the current
conditions. 

> php is open source, so if you really really need
> this
> change, the download the souce code and make the
> changes
> that suits you.
> 
>     //Anders
> 

It just so happens that documentation on compilation
of the php_gd2.dll for Windows is severely lacking
(which partially explains why my compiled dll doesn't
quite work) but theoretically, yes, I should be able
to customize the source code to my own liking.
However, this problem affects way too many people who
would use these functions for it simply to be
customized for myself.

Case in point is, I am still finding a way to resolve
this issue. Remember that if it is resolved, functions
using the code would be far more portable.

__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Find out what made the Top Yahoo! Searches of 2003
http://search.yahoo.com/top2003

-- 
PHP Windows Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

-- 
PHP Windows Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php


[Index of Archives]     [PHP Home]     [PHP Users]     [PHP Database Programming]     [PHP Install]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Yosemite Forum]     [PHP Books]

  Powered by Linux