On 11/07/06, Legine <legine.wine@xxxxxx> wrote:
Hmm, gcc supports ANSI c if I trust Wikipedia :D. so you should be fine with the standrad gcc compiler.
I forgot- it's gcc that supports ansi, NOT Turbo C! I guess that I'll just have to make an XP partition to check everything that I write in linux, to be sure that it will compile on their tools. I've already had problems, with calling libraries such as math.h and conio.h.
> So I'd prefer to use Turbo C so that I can be compatable with the rest > of the fools in the course who come over to do HW and cry when they > see a penguin. However, if there is something _similar_ native to > linux that this newbie can install, I'd love to try it. I heared a lot of good things about Code::Blocks (www.codeblocks.org) A full featured C / C ++ IDE based on gcc, but supports differnet modern compilers (MSVC++, Digital Mars, Borland C++ 5.5, Open Watcom), too. It can compile code within the IDE and comes with neat features. Works on Windows and Linux so there is a change you can confince others (your professor? ;) ) to swich to gcc and Code::Blocks. Of course all Open Source. :D Here you find help setting codeblocks up for your distribution: http://forums.codeblocks.org/index.php/topic,1194.0.html
Thanks, I got it working! Which compiler is most similar to Borlands compiler (gcc, intel, SDCC)? I thought that Borland would be one of the choices, but it is not. Dotan Cohen http://linux-apache-mysql-php.org _______________________________________________ wine-users mailing list wine-users@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.winehq.org/mailman/listinfo/wine-users
