Dotan Cohen schrieb: > On 11/07/06, CptDondo <yan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Dotan Cohen wrote: >> >> > Well, I do need to run them under the IDE. Otherwise I could just use >> > Kate and gcc. >> > >> > For that matter, is there not a native linux app that lets one compile >> > and run (an IDE)? I've tried Eclipse and Ajunta, but they don't seem >> > to do C. >> >> OK, I am confused.... >> >> Are you trying to build a dos executable using Turbo C or a linux >> executable using gcc? > > I'm trying to learn C in the university! > > I don't really care where the program _can_ run, only that I can run > it from within the IDE. We're learning pointers and arrays and > recursive functions. We are not learning to build GUIs. So I can use > whatever compiles ANSI C, so long as it compiles from within the IDE > because I'll make five hundred small changes and I need to run after > each change. Hmm, gcc supports ANSI c if I trust Wikipedia :D. so you should be fine with the standrad gcc compiler. > > > So I'd prefer to use Turbo C so that I can be compatable with the rest > of the fools in the course who come over to do HW and cry when they > see a penguin. However, if there is something _similar_ native to > linux that this newbie can install, I'd love to try it. I heared a lot of good things about Code::Blocks (www.codeblocks.org) A full featured C / C ++ IDE based on gcc, but supports differnet modern compilers (MSVC++, Digital Mars, Borland C++ 5.5, Open Watcom), too. It can compile code within the IDE and comes with neat features. Works on Windows and Linux so there is a change you can confince others (your professor? ;) ) to swich to gcc and Code::Blocks. Of course all Open Source. :D Here you find help setting codeblocks up for your distribution: http://forums.codeblocks.org/index.php/topic,1194.0.html Hope it helps Legine _______________________________________________ wine-users mailing list wine-users@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.winehq.org/mailman/listinfo/wine-users
