Uwe Bonnes <bon <at> elektron.ikp.physik.tu-darmstadt.de> writes: > > >>>>> "Eric" == Eric Pouech <no_spam_at_all_eric.pouech <at> wanadoo.fr> writes: > > Eric> azathothgr wrote: > >> There is indeed a manifest file in the same directory, which contains > >> the dll filename, plus some other info that could be needed to access > >> the file, now that you mention it.. I think wine doesn't know to > >> look for it at the moment.. I renamed it and the problem remained > >> exactly the same, so I'd guess that the manifest file was ignored. > Eric> IMO, that's not something a file which isn't found, but rather the > Eric> loading mechanism checking the actual version of a DLL required > Eric> from the manifest, for which we return another version (or > Eric> checksum or signature). > > By commenting out FindActCtxSectionString(A|W) one can make the application > start. > > It's the problem of wine stub-implementing functions that are only > implemented on the top-modern Win implementation. Most application test for > the availability of the function with GetProcAddress and with out stub > implementation they expect it to be fully implemented. > FWIW: changing the return value from FALSE to TRUE in FindActCtxSectionStringW is enough as well to make the app start fine. I don't know if that would be a "proper" fix ,or might break other applications. Anyone an idea? (maybe a question for the developmeent list...) _______________________________________________ wine-users mailing list wine-users@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.winehq.org/mailman/listinfo/wine-users
