On Fri, 2005-11-18 at 19:56 -0500, Andrew Barr wrote: > Fonts on Wine CVS post-0.9.1 are very ugly: > > http://www.oakcourt.dyndns.org/~andrew/wine-cvs.png > > But if I replace a custom-built Wine CVS installation with the Wine 0.9.1 > Debian sid package from Sourceforge, it looks much better: > > http://www.oakcourt.dyndns.org/~andrew/wine-0.9.1-sf.net.png > > I have the latest FreeType library from Debian unstable installed: 2.1.10. > The same version libfreetype6-dev package was used to build Wine CVS. Well, the packages aren't compiled on Debian sid, they're compiled on Ubuntu Breezy, which was using version 2.1.7-2.4ubuntu1 of the Freetype packages. Perhaps there's been a regression in freetype from 2.1.7 to 2.1.10? What happens if you compile version 0.9.1, sans patches, rather than CVS? Or you can do apt-get --build source wine using the winehq package, and see if it replicates the problem. Thanks, Scott Ritchie _______________________________________________ wine-users mailing list wine-users@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.winehq.org/mailman/listinfo/wine-users
