On Saturday, November 19, 2005 3:43 am, Scott Ritchie wrote: > Well, the packages aren't compiled on Debian sid, they're compiled on > Ubuntu Breezy, which was using version 2.1.7-2.4ubuntu1 of the Freetype > packages. Perhaps there's been a regression in freetype from 2.1.7 to > 2.1.10? > > What happens if you compile version 0.9.1, sans patches, rather than > CVS? Or you can do apt-get --build source wine using the winehq > package, and see if it replicates the problem. I built the clean WineHQ 0.9.1 package from source with FreeType 2.1.10 from sid and the problem was replicated. Unfortunately, it was also replicated with CVS _and_ 0.9.1 (SF.net source packages) built against FreeType 2.1.7 from breezy. So I don't think FreeType is the problem. Nonetheless, I didn't think of checking FreeType versions, so thanks for the idea. -- Andrew Barr andrew.james.barr@xxxxxxxxx | http://www.oakcourt.dyndns.org/~andrew/ Unix: starting things off with a sha-bang since the Epoch. _______________________________________________ wine-users mailing list wine-users@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.winehq.org/mailman/listinfo/wine-users
