Re: Which ( any ) windows dlls should be moved to wine?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Duane Clark wrote:
sean wrote:

I'm runiing wine-20031212 on a dual boot machine. I have both win98 and w2k installed.

Other posts have suggested these be copied. Is the the right - complete? -set?


It doesn't hurt to copy all the DLLs over. But my suggestion is that in the ~/.wine/config file, you use the default settings that comes with Wine, which configures Wine to use mostly builtin DLLs:
[DllOverrides]
"msvcrt" = "native, builtin"
"mciavi.drv" = "native, builtin"
"mcianim.drv" = "native, builtin"
"msi" = "native, builtin"
"*" = "builtin, native"


And then if a particular application is having a problem with a particular Wine DLL, then add a section for just that app to change the default:
[AppDefaults\\winword.exe\\DllOverrides]
"oleaut32" = "native, builtin"
"ole32" = "native, builtin"
"comctl32" = "native"
"rpcrt4" = "native"
Thanks.

But to be clear. I copy all the dll's over from win98, so that /usr/lib/wine/wine would have the wine dll.so's and the win98 dll's.
Then I just make the changes in the config file. Right?


Looking at the config file, I see - before any changes:

"msvcrt"       = "native, builtin"
"mciavi.drv"   = "native, builtin"
"mcianim.drv"  = "native, builtin"

Does this mean it's looking is /usr/lib/wine/wine for the native (*.dll) files, but will fall back to wine dll's ( *.dll.so)?

sean

_______________________________________________
wine-users mailing list
wine-users@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.winehq.com/mailman/listinfo/wine-users

[Index of Archives]     [Gimp for Windows]     [Red Hat]     [Samba]     [Yosemite Camping]     [Graphics Cards]     [Wine Home]

  Powered by Linux