[VLAN] kernel 2.2.18 + vlan patch around july 2001

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



(Please use only the lanforge address, since that's the official
address of the list.)


On Wed, Feb 02, 2005 at 12:10:56PM -0000, Perriot, Cedric wrote:
> using another vlan is a workaround.

Ok. I was suggesting that to get a more reliable environment to test
basic functionality.


> My customer would like to prioritize the packets without using
> vlan.

I guess that should be possible, but I'm not sure how the code deals.
What do the standards say? http://standards.ieee.org/getieee802/


> The feature can be considered as a bonus but it exists in cisco
> switches (as in other brands according to my readings) and i do not
> know what 802.1q says about it because i did not have access to the
> text.

Please let us know if you find out. I'm curious anyway. :)


//Peter

[Index of Archives]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]

  Powered by Linux