using another vlan is a workaround. My customer would like to prioritize the packets without using vlan. The feature can be considered as a bonus but it exists in cisco switches (as in other brands according to my readings) and i do not know what 802.1q says about it because i did not have access to the text. -----Message d'origine----- De : vlan-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:vlan-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] De la part de Peter Stuge Envoy? : mercredi 2 f?vrier 2005 11:27 ? : vlan@xxxxxxxxxxxx Objet : Re: [VLAN] kernel 2.2.18 + vlan patch around july 2001 On Wed, Feb 02, 2005 at 09:24:53AM -0000, Perriot, Cedric wrote: > If I try to ping B from A it fails. On ethereal I see : > ARP request tagged with vid 0 from A asking for B. > ARP reply not tagged (removed by the switch) from B. > ARP request tagged with vid 0 from A asking for B. I would try this using another VLAN and the most recent 2.4 kernel on both systems. > Maybe I am just misusing the vlan functionnality. My goal is to use > 802.1p without 802.1q to do so I would like to get a vid = 0. That wasn't the main reason for the VLAN support, obviously, but if it works I guess that's just a bonus. //Peter _______________________________________________ Vlan mailing list Vlan@xxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.lanforge.com/mailman/listinfo/vlan
