On Tue, Feb 01, 2005 at 05:29:18PM -0500, Lee F. Johnson III wrote: > IANAL, but I read it written by lawyers and been told by > lawyers, that the aforementioned "email security > disclaimers" have no bearing in law (US law). So they are > annoying, useless AND waste bandwidth. That's good. I guess one could claim that each email one sends is a work protected by copyright, but in that case I would hope they had more sense than to perform it in an environment constructed specifically to duplicate messages verbatim, for as many as possible to see and benefit from. > Kind of like my post here. :-) Thanks for the information. Sorry for straying further off-topic. //Peter
