Mr.Stuge
If you will take time to scan my original email you will find that
the bit that you have attached did not come from me. It came with the
reply from JoJan at candelatech. I merely replied to the list with his
mail attached thereby adding his statements.
I trust that will clarify things.
I am sure you could attach your helpful reply now since you did take
time to point out other matters.
S
Peter Stuge <stuge-vlan@xxxxxxx>
Sent by: vlan-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
02/01/2005 12:53 PM
Please respond to "Linux 802.1Q VLAN"
To: vlan@xxxxxxxxxxxx
cc:
Subject: Re: [VLAN] Vlan issues
On Tue, Feb 01, 2005 at 10:27:38AM -0500, warrier@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are for the sole use
> of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and
> privileged information.
[..]
> any action taken upon this e-mail is strictly prohibited and may be
> unlawful.
Please don't expect much help when you're sending stuff like this to
a public mailing list.
If you need security, I suggest you use signatures and/or encryption
as appropriate.
//Peter, who just deleted his helpful reply
_______________________________________________
Vlan mailing list
Vlan@xxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.lanforge.com/mailman/listinfo/vlan
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.lanforge.com/pipermail/vlan/attachments/20050201/000b1738/attachment-0001.htm
