On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 02:21:15PM +0200, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote: > On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 5:03 PM, Daniel P. Berrange <berrange@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 04:43:53PM +0200, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote: > >> On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 4:34 PM, Daniel P. Berrange <berrange@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 04:29:07PM +0200, Christophe Fergeau wrote: > >> >> On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 04:16:41PM +0200, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote: > >> >> > The only reason for us to keep maintaining the nsis installer was the > >> >> > activex plugin (spicex), which requires those nsis based installers. > >> >> > As the next release of RHEV/oVirt won't use the activex plugin (spicex) > >> >> > let's completely remove the nsis installer from our tree and focus on > >> >> > only maintain the msi installer. > >> >> > >> >> Given that oVirt 4.0 is not released yet, might make sense to hold that > >> >> for a bit? Maybe some last minute issue will prevent that removal. > >> > > >> > Does anyone know what the newest version of virt-viewer is that oVirt > >> > has been shipping ? It could be valid to say that if they want NSIS > >> > they should stick on the v2.0-maint of v3.0-maint branches instead > >> > of updating to the virt-viewer 4.0 release . > >> > >> 2.0 with a bunch of patch on top, considering the client is the same > >> one used for RHEVM. > > > > IMHO, since they've not even upgraded to 3.0 release version, I think > > we're fine to drop nsis in the virt-viewer-4.0 version, without waiting > > for the next oVirt release. > > Christophe? I'd go for the patch as well (but you know, the patch is mine) ... Oh sorry for not following up, I'm fine with this plan too. Christophe
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ virt-tools-list mailing list virt-tools-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/virt-tools-list
